One useful takeaway
- The BRICS bloc has failed to deliver tangible strategic benefits to India, with new members recently blocking consensus on India's UNSC ambitions.
ARTICLE PREVIEW
Gist Despite chairing the grouping and investing 17 years into its summits, India has gained negligible strategic or economic dividends from BRICS. The bloc’s institutional mechanisms have severely underperformed, and its recent expansion has paradoxically diluted diplomatic support for India's core interests, such as a permanent seat at the UN Security Council. For civil services aspirants, this critique highlights a pivotal foreign policy debate: achieving the economic growth required for a developed India by 2047 may necessitate pivoting away from a China-dominated, economically stagnating BRICS toward deeper strategic and trade alignment with Western markets. Background BRICS originated as a 2001 marketing acronym by Goldman Sachs' Jim O'Neill to encourage investment in Brazil, Russia, India, and China, before being formally adopted as a political club at the Yekaterinburg summit in 2009 with South Africa joining later . The bloc positioned itself as a champion of the Global South and a challenger to Western-dominated financial institutions, leading to the creation of the New Development Bank NDB and the Contingent Reserve Arrangement CRA in 2014 as alternatives to the World Bank and the…
Checking your learner access…
We are securely restoring your session. The complete article will open automatically.